Critique Guidelines
General Guidelines
1: When reviewing a story, criticize the work, not the writer.
2: If you place the word CRIT and your initials in the subject of the story you're reviewing, the list will know which crit the author is responding to. This makes it much easier to pinpoint responses to your crit.
3: If you say what you like first, it will make the author more receptive to your criticisms.
4: Be careful to distinguish between things that are technically incorrect, such as grammar and spelling, and those that are a matter of opinion. The latter should be introduced with a qualifying statement such as "I think...", "I believe...", "(x) doesn't work for me because...".
5: You should try to offer a solution when you find a problem. Note that doesn't mean to rewrite parts of the story for the writer. Further, don't insist that the writer change the story as you suggested. The key word in this guideline is "try", though. Don't feel that you have to offer a solution to every comment.
6: When preparing to critique a story, it is suggested that you not read anyone else's crit before performing your own (but you could read others' before you post, and modify your responses). Why? The best feedback a writer can receive is your objective first impression. This, however, is left to your discretion.
Detailed Questions
Note that these questions are intended as a tool to help you frame your thoughts. You are welcome to use some or all of these in your critique, but it is not required.
Scene and Structure
- Did the first several paragraphs establish the setting and grab you (aka "the hook")?
- If a sequel or serial, did it recap effectively?
- Were scene transitions orchestrated well?
- Any scenes unnecessary?
- Comment on your opinion of the author's writing style (fluid, jerky, mechanical, etc.).
Plot
- Was the story well-paced and events believable (within the context of the story)?
- Is there anything wildly out of context (e.g. anachronisms)?
- Was the ending satisfying or was it too easy?
Characterization
- Were main characters developed and believable in their actions?
- Was the dialogue well-executed and appropriate for the characters? Did it flow naturally, or did it seem stilted?
- Name one character that engaged you (or didn't) and why.
Point of View and Perspective
- Are the point of view and perspective chosen correctly?
- Are there any inappropriate, confusing, or unnecessary point of view or perspective changes?
Summary
- How do you rate the readability of this story?
- Did it involve you? In what way (e.g. emotionally, intellectually or imaginatively)?